Zoom Issues A Return To Office Mandate For Its Workers — But Its ‘Chief People Officer’ Remains Remote

Their customer base reflects this, too. Many of their customers use Zoom products that are specifically and solely designed for in-office work. Saxon said the company can’t adequately serve these customers with a 100% remote workforce. (He does not appear to have given Fortune any explanation as to why that is the case.)

So, the company implemented a new return-to-office scheme last August, in which workers within 50 miles of one of Zoom’s four offices, located in San Jose and Santa Barbara, California, Denver, Colorado, and Kansas City, Missouri, must come into the office twice a week.

A 50-mile radius constitutes a pretty substantial commute, even if only two days a week, and the high costs of commuting, which have skyrocketed since the pre-pandemic days, are among the main reasons workers have been balking at return-to-office mandates in the first place.

But when it comes to Zoom’s RTO, that is far from the main thing raising eyebrows.

The Chief People Officer insists he can do his job — managing people — from his home office in Austin, Texas, without issue.

While Saxon insisted that Zoom’s many in-office customers can only adequately be served face-to-face by in-office workers, his own face-to-face, people-centric job — it’s literally called Chief People Officer, after all — apparently does not necessitate the same on-site arrangement.

“I think I can manage people at Zoom effectively while working fully remotely,” Saxon told Fortune, once again offering no details for why that is the case. “I go into the office from time to time, obviously, for my role,” he went on to say, “but the majority of the time, I’m home.” Oh, okay, if you say so!

This uneven application of the policy is an awfully curious choice. Aside from the hierarchical “deal with it, peons” message it sends to workers, it doesn’t really make much sense.

Zoom employees servicing in-office clients presumably have to fly to those clients’ offices to do their in-person work, so what difference does it make where they do their jobs the rest of the time?
 
The inequitable enforcement certainly raised hackles online. To the irreverently named X (aka Twitter) account “[Eff] You I Quit,” which focuses on workplace and labor issues, it stunk of an outright ploy for “a reduction in workforce without the bad publicity or hit to their unemployment insurance.”
 
They are certainly not the first to theorize that layoffs without the drama are what’s really behind many return-to-office mandates.

One thing is for sure — what’s not behind RTO mandates, no matter what business leaders claim, is higher productivity or profits. A major study by the University of Pittsburgh of hundreds of Fortune 500 companies found that 99% of them saw no increase in profit from RTO mandates — but they did see a staggering drop in employee morale, which leads to very expensive turnover.

If pissing your employees off is the goal, an RTO is the way to go, and you probably couldn’t come up with a better version than one that forces employees to drive 50 miles to do their jobs without justification while the Chief People Officer gets to keep chilling in his home office.